R. v. Ho Wai Sing and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1441/1994 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 23 May 1995.

1. This is an appeal from Ms. Au-Yeung at Fan Ling. These two Appellants were charged with making use of altered fittings of a vehicle for the purpose of smuggling and sentenced each to four months imprisonment. They were also charged with being in possession of dutiable goods, namely light diesel oil. The 1st Defendant was fined, the 2nd Defendant was sent to prison.

Case No.HCMA 1441/1994
Court
High Court CFI
Date23 May 1995
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA001441/1994

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1441 OF 1994

____________

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
HO WAI SING 1st Appellant
LUI ON NING 2nd Appellant

____________

Coram: The Hon. Mr. Justice Sears in Court

Date of hearing: 23 May 1995

Date of judgment: 23 May 1995

_________________

J U D G M E N T

_________________

1. This is an appeal from Ms. Au-Yeung at Fan Ling. These two Appellants were charged with making use of altered fittings of a vehicle for the purpose of smuggling and sentenced each to four months imprisonment. They were also charged with being in possession of dutiable goods, namely light diesel oil. The 1st Defendant was fined, the 2nd Defendant was sent to prison.

2. The circumstances were that the Customs and Excise had been keeping watch on these two and saw them transfer light diesel oil. They were clearly smuggling.

3. These are serious offences and the magistrate was in my judgment, quite right to impose a sentence of imprisonment. The only matter that really falls for consideration is whether or not this should be suspended. The 1st Defendant is a man of good character and in my judgment not sufficient weight was given by the magistrate to that, and his plea of guilty. Courts are empowered to pass suspended sentences for those who require it. It is not a soft option. It is still a punishment.

4. I therefore, consider that the 1st Defendant's sentence should have been suspended. It would cause, in my judgment, unfairness on the part of the 2nd Defendant were I also not to suspend that sentence. I think he is very lucky, he has got pervious convictions, but he pleaded guilty and in those circumstances, I am prepared to suspend the sentence for him as well.

Representation:

Miss Maria Ip, S.A.C.P. for Crown.

Mr. J.R.W. Jenkyn - Jones (Ho, Li, Lo, Lam & Yeung) for Appellants.

(R.A.W. Sears)
Judge of the High Court