HKSAR v. Leung Yuen Sun

Case No.HCCC 144/2024[2024] HKCFI 3378
Court
High Court CFI
Date30 Oct 2024
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCCC 144/2024

[2024] HKCFI 3378

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 144 OF 2024

________________________

  HKSAR  
  v  
  Leung Yuen-sun  

________________________

Before:  Hon Andrew Chan J
Date:  30 October 2024 at 9.50 am
Present:  Ms Rosa Lo, SPP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
  Mr Wong Hing-wai Newman, instructed by Li & Partners, assigned by DLA, for the accused
Offence:   Trafficking in dangerous drugs (販運危險藥物)

________________________________________

Transcript of the Audio Recording
of the Sentence in the above Case

________________________________________

COURT: The defendant has pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance in the Magistrates’ Court. He is committed to this court for sentence.

In the early hours on 21 July 2022, the defendant was intercepted by police officers at Kwai Chung Estate. Upon a body search, 34.32 grammes of heroin and 0.09 grammes of midazolam were found inside his trousers pocket. Under caution, the defendant admitted that he was delivering the heroin in question to Yau Ma Tei.

The street value was estimated to be over HK$42,000.

The defendant is now 48, educated up to Form 1 level. He has 12 criminal records with multiple offences, four in particular relating to the offence of possession of dangerous drugs.

Notional starting point for trafficking in 34.32 grammes of heroin is one of 82 months’ imprisonment. Without further evidence pointing to the contrary, this court is prepared to accept that the defendant was acting as a courier at the material time.

For the purpose of sentencing, the 0.09 grammes of midazolam is also ignored.

However, this is not his first conviction involving dangerous drugs. He has, as I said, four dangerous drugs record. In addition, the defendant also committed the present offence whilst he was on court bail in relation to the conviction described in item 12 of his criminal records. For that, the sentence is enhanced to one of 90 months’ imprisonment.

The defendant of course is entitled to the full one-third discount for his earliest plea.

In conclusion, for the offence the defendant stands convicted, he is therefore sentenced to 60 months’ imprisonment.