The Queen v. Ng Kam Kwai
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 807/1995 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 28 February 1996.
1. This was an appeal against a conviction for an offence of wounding contrary to s.19 of the Offences Against the Person Ordinance, Cap. 212 and a sentence of Training Centre. So far as the appeal against conviction was concerned, suffice it for me to say that I found no merit in the appeal grounds.
|
HCMA000807/1995 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 807 OF 1995 --------------
-------------- Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court Date of hearing : 14 February 1996 Date of handing down judgment : 28 February 1996 ------------------------ J U D G M E N T ------------------------ 1. This was an appeal against a conviction for an offence of wounding contrary to s.19 of the Offences Against the Person Ordinance, Cap. 212 and a sentence of Training Centre. So far as the appeal against conviction was concerned, suffice it for me to say that I found no merit in the appeal grounds. 2. However, in relation to sentence, I was satisfied that the learned Magistrate's sentence in this case was manifestly excessive, and flew in the face of a probation report which suggested 12 months probation and which was, in all respects, favourable to the Appellant. In his Reasons for Sentence, the learned Magistrate simply said this:
3. I did not consider this to be sufficient reason for sending a first offender to a Training Centre. I regarded such a sentence as inappropriate and savage. I allowed the appeal against sentence and substituted a 12 month Probation Order on condition that the Appellant work and live as directed by the Probation Officer. Representation: Mr John Reading, S.A.C.P., for Crown Mr Robert Pang, (Chan & Cheng), for Appellant
|