Liu Guiqiao v. Mak Lok Man (also known as Mak Lok Man Mandy) and Another
|
HCA 1489/2019 [2024] HKCFI 3648 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 1489 OF 2019 ____________
____________
____________________________________ REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ____________________________________ A. INTRODUCTION 1.In these proceedings, the Plaintiff (“Mr Liu”) claimed recovery of a loan of $15m (“the Loan”), against the 1st Defendant (“Ms Mak”) as one of the borrowers under a loan agreement dated 24th September 2017 (“the Loan Agreement”), and against the 2nd Defendant (“Mr Lok”) as the guarantor under a personal guarantee and indemnity also dated 24th September 2017 (“the Personal Guarantee”). 2.Ms Mak and Mr Lok filed defences and witness statements, but ultimately did not appear at the trial of the claim. I was satisfied that they had been given notice of the trial dates. The trial proceeded in their absence. 3.Mr Liu and his assistant Ms Ma Fung Wah (“Ms Ma”) gave evidence at trial, which I accepted. B. THE FACTS 4.The following appeared from the witness statements of Mr Liu and Ms Ma, and the documents placed before the court, and were undisputed. I find them as facts. 5.Mr Liu got to know Mr Lok in about 2015. Some time in 2017, Mr Liu was told by Mr Lok that he and his son (“Lok Junior”; together with Mr Lok “the Loks”) were operating profitable restaurants in Hong Kong. Mr Liu said that his business was, in comparison, underperforming. After some discussions, the Loks proposed to Mr Liu the establishment of a joint venture and the merger of Mr Liu’s restaurants with the Loks’ existing and future restaurants. 6.It was against that background that Mr Liu, Lok Junior and Ms Mak entered into the following agreements:
7.The Loan was advanced on 24th September 2017, as evidenced by the following.
8.Lok Junior was adjudged bankrupt on 27th February 2019. 9.On behalf of Mr Liu, Messrs Au, Thong & Tsang issued demand letters to Mr Lok on 6th May 2019 and Ms Mak on 25th June 2019 respectively, seeking repayment of the Loan. 10.The Loan was not repaid. C. LIABILITY UNDER THE LOAN AGREEMENT AND THE PERSONAL GUARANTEE 11.Upon Lok Junior’s bankruptcy, the Loan became immediately due and payable by Ms Mak in accordance with clause 8(b) of the Loan Agreement, and by Mr Lok in accordance with cll.3.1, 3.2 and 4.1 of the Personal Guarantee. 12.Ms Mak and Mr Lok pleaded a number of factual matters in their defences, but as they did not appear at trial to give evidence, none of these were substantiated. 13.In relation to interest, counsel for Mr Liu, Ms Queenie Ng, indicated that Mr Liu would not seek the (unpleaded) contractual interest, but only interest at the rate of 1% above prime rate. 14.I therefore gave judgment for Mr Liu for $15m, together with (a) interest at the rate of 1% above the prime rate of HSBC from 15th August 2019 to 19th June 2024 and thereafter at judgment rate until payment, and (b) costs of the action, to be taxed if not agreed.
Ms Queenie Ng and Ms Tessa Chan, instructed by Au, Thong & Tsang, for the Plaintiff The 1st Defendant was not represented and did not appear The 2nd Defendant was not represented and did not appear | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||