The Queen v. Wong Lam-hoi
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1133/1995 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 March 1996.
1. This was an appeal against a sentence of eight months imposed for two offences against the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance. In his Reasons for Sentence, the learned Magistrate said this :
|
HCMA001133/1995 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1133 OF 1995 ---------------
--------------- Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court Dates of hearing : 15 February and 1 March 1996 Date of handing down judgment : 6 March 1996 ------------------------ J U D G M E N T ------------------------ 1. This was an appeal against a sentence of eight months imposed for two offences against the Dutiable Commodities Ordinance. In his Reasons for Sentence, the learned Magistrate said this :
2. I agreed entirely with all that the learned Magistrate had to say except that I felt that in the circumstances the Appellant deserved a greater discount for his assistance to the Customs & Excise Department. Courts should go a long way towards encouraging criminals to assist the authorities in prosecuting their former accomplices. I would have allowed a discount of four months for the Appellant's assistance in this case. I therefore allowed the appeal to the extent of reducing the sentences from eight months to six months. Both will be served concurrently. Representation: Mr P.S. Chapman, C.C., for Crown (appearing on 15.2.1996) Mr Albert Wong, S.C.C., for Crown (appearing on 1.3.1996) Appellant Wong Lam Hoi in person - 2 -
|