Success Lane Development Ltd v. Ifc Development (Suite) Ltd As Agent for Ifc Development Ltd

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 3838/2023 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 17 December 2024.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.DCCJ 3838/2023[2024] HKDC 2184
Court
District Court
Date17 Dec 2024
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 3838/2023

[2024] HKDC 2184

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3838 OF 2023

________________________

BETWEEN

  SUCCESS LANE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Plaintiff
  and  
  IFC DEVELOPMENT (SUITE)  LIMITED Defendant
  AS AGENT FOR IFC DEVELOPMENT LIMITED  

________________________

Before:  His Honour Judge Alan Kwong in Chambers (Open to the Public)
Date of Hearing:  17 December 2024
Date of Decision:  17 December 2024
Date of Corrigendum:  15 January 2025

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 17 Decision 2024:-

The following words be amended in Paragraph 5: “At the present hearing, the Plaintiff, through its director Madame Jessie Jesse Yung, acts in person…”

The following words be amended in Paragraph 17: “At the present hearing, Madame Jessie Jesse Yung (for the Plaintiff)  keeps emphasizing that...”

The following words be amended in Paragraph 19: “At the previous hearing on 14th August 2024, Madame Jessie Jesse Yung argued that…”.

The following words be amended in paragraph 39(1): “Madame Jessie Jesse Yung, who represented the Plaintiff at the hearing on 14th August 2024, was unable to explain…”

The following words be amended in paragraph 48: “Having considered the skeleton submissions from the Plaintiff’s former counsel and having heard Madame Jessie Jesse Yung …

The following words be amended in paragraph 50: “The Plaintiff alleges that Madame Jessie Jesse Yung was absent from the hearing on 15th April 2024 due to sickness...”

The following words be amended in paragraph 58: “As pointed out in paragraph 36 of the Decision, I took the view that the Plaintiff’s case was unarguably bad, utterly unmeritorious and the court’s process was abused. In the circumstances, it was plainly appropriate to order indemnity costs in order to show the court’s disapproval of the Plaintiff’s litigation conduct.”


Dated the 25th day of January 2025

(YUEN Tik-man)
Clerk to District Judge Alan Kwong