Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001165/1995 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 February 1996.
1. This was an appeal against a conviction on two charges of doing an act tending and intended to pervert the course of public justice. The facts arose out of a District Court trial in which the Appellant was one of two defendants facing a charge of false imprisonment. One of the witnesses against him was Yeung Wai Ping. She testified in the instant case that the Appellant on two occasions coached her on the way she should give her evidence against him in the District Court trial.