The Queen v. Boromeo Charles
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1244/1995 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 February 1996.
1. This was an appeal against a sentence of nine months for making a false representation to an Immigration Office. In his Reasons for Sentence, the learned Magistrate said this :
|
HCMA001244/1995 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY APPEAL No.1244 of 1995 ------------------
------------------ Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court Date of hearing : 9 February 1996 Date of handing down judgment : 15 February 1996 ---------------------- J U D G M E N T ---------------------- 1. This was an appeal against a sentence of nine months for making a false representation to an Immigration Office. In his Reasons for Sentence, the learned Magistrate said this :
2. That in fact was a misreading of the case, as the sentence imposed in that case was not nine months but one of six months. Furthermore, as the learned Magistrate went on to say :
However, the Magistrate then went on to suggest that the sentence should nevertheless be one of nine months because :
3. The learned Magistrate therefore returned to the sentence of nine months which he thought was supported by Bewley J's judgment in Bhangwant Singh-Padda, Magistracy Appeal No.1447 of 1988. As I have already pointed out this was a mistake on the part of the learned Magistrate and the sentence should therefore have been one of six months. The appeal was allowed accordingly. Representation: Mr Wesley W.C. Wong, S.C.C., for Crown Mrs Penelope Wacks (D.L.A.) for Appellant Boromeo Charles - 2 -
|