The Queen v. Tsang Ling Ho and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 24/1996 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 February 1996.
1. This was an appeal against a conviction for hawking without a licence, obstruction, contrary to s.4A of the Summary Offence Ordinance Cap.228 and also against a fine of $1,000 on each offence and an order confiscating a private car. The facts simply were that the appellants were seen to be selling goods from the boot of a private car parked in Granville Road.
|
HCMA000024/1996 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.24 OF 1996 --------------------
-------------------- Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court Date of hearing : 8 February 1996 Date of handing down judgment : 15 February 1996 ------------------------- J U D G M E N T ------------------------- 1. This was an appeal against a conviction for hawking without a licence, obstruction, contrary to s.4A of the Summary Offence Ordinance Cap.228 and also against a fine of $1,000 on each offence and an order confiscating a private car. The facts simply were that the appellants were seen to be selling goods from the boot of a private car parked in Granville Road. 2. I had no difficulty in dismissing the appeal against conviction as the evidence against the appellants in that regard was overwhelming. 3. The only point of merit in the appeal was the submission that the confiscation of the private car was a harsh punishment. I agreed. Confiscation of the goods in question was sufficient in this case. I therefore allowed the appeal to the extent that I removed the confiscation order so far as the car was concerned. The penalty otherwise remains the same. Representation: Mr Tam Yiu Ho, S.C.C., for Crown Appellants (Tsang Ling Ho & Ngai Hoi) in person - 2 -
|