Re Bank of China (Hong Kong) Trustees Ltd
Read the full judgment text of DCMP 5517/2024 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 11 February 2025.
1. This is an application made by the Bank of China (Hong Kong) Trustees Ltd(中國銀行(香港)信託有限公司)(the “ applicant ”) by ex parte originating summons filed on 27 September 2024 for an order inter alia , to pay into court certain unclaimed assets, identified in the schedule thereto as follows: (1) HK$59,843.20, presently held by the applicant in a bank account at Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited (“ BOCHK ”), No. 012-875-0-016508-8 (the “ Bank Account ”), and interest accrued thereon from 30 August 201
Cites 1 case
|
DCMP 5517/2024 [2025] HKDC 203 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 5517 OF 2024 --------------------------------
--------------------------------
--------------------- JUDGMENT --------------------- 1.This is an application made by the Bank of China (Hong Kong) Trustees Ltd(中國銀行(香港)信託有限公司)(the “applicant”) by ex parte originating summons filed on 27 September 2024 for an order inter alia, to pay into court certain unclaimed assets, identified in the schedule thereto as follows: (1) HK$59,843.20, presently held by the applicant in a bank account at Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited (“BOCHK”), No. 012-875-0-016508-8 (the “Bank Account”), and interest accrued thereon from 30 August 2012; (2) 2,039 shares in Kowloon Development Company Limited(九龍建業有限公司)(“KDC”); and (3) 501 shares in Transport International Holdings Ltd(載通國際控股有限公司)(“TIH”). 2.However, at the hearing, Mr Cheung informed the court that the shares in KDC and TIH are not held in the applicant’s name, but rather in the name of Sin Hua Trust Company (“SHT”). He asked for leave to amend the schedule to the originating summons to remove references to the shares in KDC and TIH therefrom, which the court granted during the hearing. 3.Therefore, the application concerns only the money held by the applicant in the Bank Account (the “Unclaimed Assets”). 4.The application is supported by the Affirmation of Leung Pui San (“Leung”), dated 26 September 2024. Leung is the senior operational risk manager of BOCHK, the parent company of the applicant. 5.This application closely resembles that made by the applicant in DCMP 5291/2024, involving similar facts. I handed down the judgment in DCMP 5291/2024 (the “DCMP 5291 Judgment”) on the same day as the judgment in this case. This judgment should be read in conjunction with the DCMP 5291 Judgment. To avoid duplication, I will refer to the relevant paragraphs from the DCMP 5291 Judgment where appropriate. A. Background 6.I refer to §§3-4 of the DCMP 5291 Judgment for the background of this application. B. The Unclaimed Assets 7.The genesis of the Unclaimed Assets is as follows. 8.The Unclaimed Assets relate to the estate (the “Estate”) of Louie Yu Yong(雷玉容)(the “Deceased”), who died intestate in Taishan City, Guangdong Province, PRC, on 21 February 1985. 9.On 1 August 2007, Zhang Su Qin(張素琴)(“ZSQ”), the Deceased’s daughter and a beneficiary of the Estate, executed a Power of Attorney (the “PA”) appointing the applicant as her lawful attorney to manage all matters related to the Estate and to obtain a grant of representation for it. 10.The Letters of Administration for the Estate (under HCAG 013103 of 2009) (the “Letters of Administration”) were granted by the Probate Registry of High Court of Hong Kong on 15 April 2010 to the applicant, acting as the lawful attorney for ZSQ, and are limited for her use and benefit until she duly applies for and obtains a like grant. 11.The Estate consisted solely of the Deceased’s interest in the estate of Louie Ka Ching(雷家禎), the Deceased’s father, which included 8,156 shares in KDC and 2,007 shares in TIH. On 29 February 2012, the Estate was distributed among the Deceased’s mother, Wu Zhong(伍仲)(“WZ”), deceased, ZSQ, and the Deceased’s younger daughter, Zhang Su Yun(張素雲)(“ZSY”). Following the distribution, the amount held by the applicant in the Bank Account was HK$29,674.49. According to a letter from the applicant dated 5 June 2024, the balance was at HK$59,592.70 as of the same date. This increase is attributed to the fact that, although the shares in KDC and TIH were held in the name of SHT, the dividends were paid into the Bank Account. 12.As of the date of Leung’s Affirmation on 26 September 2024, the undisposed Estate amounted to HK$59,843.20, currently held by the applicant in the Bank Account, as detailed in §1 above. C. Applicable legal principles 13.I refer to §§13-16 of the DCMP 5291 Judgment for the applicable legal principles. 14.In my view, all the conditions under s104 of the TO are satisfied. 15.First, as stated in §19 of the DCMP 5291 Judgment, the applicant is a trust company. 16.Second, I am satisfied that the Unclaimed Assets are trust assets for the following reasons:
17.Third, I am satisfied that the Unclaimed Assets have been unclaimed by the person entitled to them for a period of 6 years after they became payable to that person (see §22 below for further details). 18.As I have concluded that the applicant is entitled to an order under s.104 of the TO, it is not necessary for me to address whether the applicant is also entitled to an order under s62(1) of the TO. However, for the sake of completeness, I will address this issue. 19.I repeat §§23-25 of the DCMP 5291 Judgment for the legal principles applicable to an application under s62(1) of the TO. 20.I am satisfied that the conditions under s62(1) have been satisfied. 21.First, the money in the Bank Account is indeed trust property. 22.Second, I am satisfied that the applicant has taken all steps to identify and locate the beneficiaries. In particular:
D. Costs 23.I repeat §29 of the DCMP 5291 Judgment which also applies, mutatis mutandis, to the costs of this application as it applies to the costs of the DCMP 5291 Action. E. Order 24.In the premises, I make of the following orders:
25.I thank Mr Cheung for the assistance he has provided to the court.
Mr Cheung Chung Chuen George, instructed by Eversheds Sutherland, for the applicant |
Cases cited in this judgment