R. v. Chim Wai Chu

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 789/1996 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 1 October 1996.

1. This Appellant was convicted on 19 June 1996 of the possession of a forged identity card, and illegally remaining in Hong Kong having landed unlawfully. Police officers had spoken to her in Yuen Long, as a result of which she was asked for her identity card. This looked to the officers as if it was a forgery, and she admitted that she had bought the card in Shenzhen. She went on to tell the police that she had sneaked into Hong Kong by boat.

Case No.HCMA 789/1996
Court
High Court CFI
Date01 Oct 1996
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000789/1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 789 OF 1996

--------------------------------

BETWEEN
THE QUEEN
AND
CHIM WAI CHU

-------------------------------

Coram: Stuart-Moore, J. in Court

Date of Hearing : 1 October 1996

Date of Judgment: 1 October 1996

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

1. This Appellant was convicted on 19 June 1996 of the possession of a forged identity card, and illegally remaining in Hong Kong having landed unlawfully. Police officers had spoken to her in Yuen Long, as a result of which she was asked for her identity card. This looked to the officers as if it was a forgery, and she admitted that she had bought the card in Shenzhen. She went on to tell the police that she had sneaked into Hong Kong by boat.

2. The Appellant is 54 and comes from China. She pleaded guilty before Mr. C.R. Mackintosh at the Tuen Mun Magistrates' Court. No particular mitigation was advanced to reduce the sentence which is normally passed. That sentence, almost invariably, is one of 15 months' imprisonment. Whilst I am very sad for you, I can say that there is nothing which was wrong with the way in which the learned Magistrate approached your case. You knew the risks you were taking when you came here, and the sentence is the same for everybody unless there are special humanitarian reasons to depart from it. It would be wrong for me to change the sentence and I am afraid it must stand. The appeal is dismissed.

Representation:

Mr. P.G. Saw for Crown.

Appellant in person.

(M. Stuart Moore)
Judge of the High Court