Bao Thi Tinh and Another v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
|
HCAL 1484/2022 [2025] HKCFI 1561 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 1484 of 2022
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Following;
Order by Deputy High Court Judge To:
Observations for the Applicant: Introduction 1.This is the Applicants’ application by Form 86 filed on 13 December 2022 for leave to apply for judicial review (the “leave application”) of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”) dismissing their appeal against the decision of the Director of Immigration refusing their application for non-refoulement protection (the “Decision”). Discussion and conclusion 2.On 1 April 2025, the 1st Applicant applied by affirmation to withdraw their leave application (the “withdrawal application”) asserting (i) that their withdrawal application is made out of her own free will; (ii) that it is now safe for them to return to their home country; (iii) that they understand that if their application to withdraw is approved, the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office dismissing their appeal against the decision of the Director of Immigration remains in force; and (iv) that they wish to return to their home country. 3.In view of the assertions in her affirmation, the Court is satisfied that the Applicants made the withdrawal application out of their own free will; that they understands if their withdrawal application is allowed, their leave application may be withdrawn; that the Decision of the Board will be final and binding on them; and that they may be refouled to their home country. Accordingly, the Court allowed their withdrawal application and granted leave for them to withdraw their leave application. Dated the 15th day of April 2025
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Form CALL-1 |