Re China Evergrande Group (in Liquidation)

Read the full judgment text of HCCW 220/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 April 2025.

1. In paragraph 3(1), lines O-P, “The Holder and the Trustee, both of which are financial institutions, do have any economic interest in the CEG Notes…” should read “The Holder and the Trustee, both of which are financial institutions, do not have any economic interest in the CEG Notes…”.

Cited by 10 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCCW 220/2022[2025] HKCFI 1638[2024] 1 HKLRD 1128
Court
High Court CFI
Date17 Apr 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCW 220/2022

[2025] HKCFI 1638

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMPANIES (WINDING-UP)  PROCEEDINGS NO 220 OF 2022

________________________

  IN THE MATTER of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions)  Ordinance (Cap. 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of China Evergrande Group (中國恒大集團)  (in liquidation)

________________________

Before:   Hon Linda Chan J in Chambers
Date of Hearing:  27 February 2025
Date of Further Submissions:  14 March 2025
Date of Decision:  17 April 2025
Date of Corrigendum:  3 June 2025

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 17 April 2025:-

1.In paragraph 3(1), lines O-P, “The Holder and the Trustee, both of which are financial institutions, do have any economic interest in the CEG Notes…” should read “The Holder and the Trustee, both of which are financial institutions, do not have any economic interest in the CEG Notes…”.

(Hilary Yu)
for Registrar, High Court