Gcgc Ltd v. Frank Ye Jun and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 565/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 May 2025.
1. At page 2, line J, “Concurrent Wirt” should read as “Concurrent Writ”;
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCA 565/2023 [2025] HKCFI 1987 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 565 OF 2023 __________________ BETWEEN
__________________
__________________ C O R R I G E N D U M __________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 30 May 2025:- 1.At page 2, line J, “Concurrent Wirt” should read as “Concurrent Writ”; 2.At page 2, line R, “or alternatively to the all of the above” should read as “or alternatively to all of the above”; 3.At page 4, line C, “Hong Kong Company” should read as “Hong Kong company”; 4.At page 10, line M, “joined D2” should read as “join D2”; 5.At page 14, line F, “in facts” should read as “in fact”; 6.At page 18, lines C to D, “duty to make full and frank disclose, and that an application for leave to issue a writ for service out ought to be make with great care and looked at strictly” should read as “duty to make full and frank disclosure, and that an application for leave to issue a writ for service out ought to be made with great care and looked at strictly”; 7.At page 38, line R, “the latter if” should read as “the latter of”; 8.At page 40, line B, “form the preliminary view” should read as “formed the preliminary view”; 9.At page 44, line B, “it would not be grossly unfair” should read as “it would be grossly unfair”.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 565/2023