Read the full judgment text of CACV 370/2024 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 June 2025.
1. I have the benefit of reading in draft the judgments of G Lam JA and Chow JA. I agree for the reasons given in Chow JA’s judgment that the appeal should be allowed with costs, the order of mandamus made by the Judge be set aside and the Applicant’s appeal against the refusal of legal aid be remitted to another Master for reconsideration. I also agree that the remitter should be on the terms proposed, to which I wish to add a few words of explanation.
Cites 3 cases