Sahab Singh v. Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

HCAL 735/2020

[2025] HKCFI 2912

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO. 735 OF 2020

_____________

_____________

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

Please note the following corrigendum for the Form CALL-1 dated 7 July 2025:

(1)Page 1, Page 3, “Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office” should be read “Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office”.

(2)Page 1, Paragraph 1, 2^nd line, “the Torture Claims Appeal Board/…” should be read “an adjudicator of the…”.

(3)Page 1, Paragraph 1, 3^rd line, 4^th line, “TCAB” should be read “NRCPO”.

(4)Page 1, Paragraph 2, 1^st line, “The TCAB Decision was made pursuant to a petition/appeal from …” should be read “The NRCPO Decision was made pursuant to a petition from …”.

(5)Page 1, Paragraph 2, 2^nd line, 3^rd line, “In the Form 86, DI was also named as a putative respondent, …” should be read “In the Form 86, the Torture Claims Appeal Board and the DI were named as putative respondents, …”.

(6)Page 1, Paragraph 2, 4^th line, “name DI as a putative interested party.” Should be read “name the NRCPO as a putative respondent and the DI as a putative interested party.”.

(7)Page 2, Paragraph 4, 2^nd line, “TCAB Decision” should be read “NRCPO Decision”.

(8)Page 2, Paragraph 4, 3^rd line, “TCAB conducted an oral hearing for the Applicant’s appeal/petition.” should be read “the NRCPO conducted an oral hearing for the Applicant’s petition.”.

(9)Page 2, Paragraph 4, 4^th line, “TCAB found that, …” should be read “the NRCPO found that, …”.

(10)Page 2, Paragraph 4, 9^th line, “the Applicant’s appeal/petition was…” should be read “the Applicant’s petition was…”.

(11)Page 2, Paragraph 5, 2^nd line, “assessment of whether any risk of ill-treatment exists lies with TCAB.” should be read “assessment of whether any risk of ill-treatment exists lies with the NRCPO”.

(12)Page 2, Paragraph 5, 3^rd line, “the Court would not reopen TCAB’s …” should be read “the Court would not reopen the NRCPO’s …”.

(13)Page 2, Paragraph 6, 1^st line, “the TCAB Decision” should be read “the NRCPO Decision”.