HKSAR v. Md Chan

Read the full judgment text of HCCC 308/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 May 2025.

Case No.HCCC 308/2023[2025] HKCFI 3073
Court
High Court CFI
Date06 May 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCC 308/2023

HCCC 309/2023

(Heard together)

[2025] HKCFI 3073

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NOS 308 AND 309 OF 2023

________________________

HKSAR
v
Md Chan (HCCC 308/2023) (D1)
Fahad Al Reza (HCCC 309/2023) (D2)

________________________

Before:  Hon Andrew Chan J
Date:  6 May 2025 at 3.10 pm
Present:   Mr Michael Delaney, on fiat, for HKSAR
  Mr Richard Donald and Mr Patrick Wan (on pro bono basis), instructed by Lo, Wong & Tsui, assigned by DLA, for the accused in HCCC 308/2023
  Mr Andrew John Raffell, instructed by Chiu, Szeto & Cheng, assigned by DLA, for the accused in HCCC 309/2023
Offence:   (1) Trafficking in dangerous drugs (販運危險藥物) in HCCC 308/2023
  (1) Trafficking in dangerous drugs (販運危險藥物) in HCCC 309/2023

________________________

Transcript of the Audio Recording

of the Sentence in the above Case

________________________


COURT: Both defendants have pleaded guilty, D1 on the first day of the trial whereas D2 at the committal stage, to one count of trafficking in dangerous drugs, contrary to section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance.

In the evening on 18 June 2022, D1 was intercepted by police officers outside one apartment in Tsim Sha Tsui. Upon noticing the presence of the police, D1 tried to flee but was eventually subdued.

Police officers armed with keys found from D1 entered the apartment. Inside the apartment, they found D2. In addition, police officers also found 17.01 grammes of cocaine, 7.21 grammes of methamphetamine, 1.02 grammes of ketamine, 1.67 grammes of cannabis in herbal form, 0.93 grammes of tetrahydrocannabinol, and 5.20 grammes

of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, a number of resealable plastic bags, and an electronic scale.

Both defendants admitted that all the dangerous drugs found in the apartment were for the purpose of trafficking.

D1 is 36, native of Bangladesh. He first came to Hong Kong in 2012 and then left in 2017. He returned to Hong Kong in 2019. He is a Form 8 holder claiming refugee status. D1 has five criminal convictions, four relating to the possession of dangerous drugs.

D2 is 49, also a native of Bangladesh. He has one criminal record similar to the present charge. D2 first came to Hong Kong in 2006. He is also a Form 8 holder pending refugee claim.

Although D2 has been suffering from epilepsy, judging from the medication provided, it is not the most serious kind and his conditions have been catered for by the Correctional Services Department.

In calculating the overall starting point, given the small amount of cannabis and its derivatives, they are to be ignored for the purpose of sentencing.

In short, both defendants will be sentenced on 7.21 grammes of ‘Ice’, 17.01 grammes of cocaine and 6.22 grammes of ketamine and MDMA. Counsel from both sides have agreed that the starting point calculated under various tests, based on quantity alone, will be one of 84 months’ imprisonment.

There are two aggravating features in the present case, namely the involvement of multiple drugs and the two defendants’ immigration status. For that a total of 12 months, ie 6 months each will be added. Thus the overall starting point will be set at 96 months’ imprisonment.

D1 has only pleaded guilty on the first day of the trial. A 20 per cent discount will be given. For the sole offence D1 stands convicted, he is therefore sentenced to 76 months’ imprisonment.

D2, given the fact that he pleaded guilty at the committal stage, a full one-third discount will be given. For the sole offence D2 stands convicted, he is therefore sentenced to 64 months’ imprisonment.

I/we certify that to the best of my/our ability and skill, the foregoing is a true transcript of the audio recording of the above proceedings
Jeremiah Barcena Castro
Date: 14 May 2025

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCCC 308/2023