Hossain Mohammed Belal v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 566/2020 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 August 2025.

1. The Form 86 is amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the Putative Respondent;

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 566/2020[2025] HKCFI 3526
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Aug 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 566/2020

[2025] HKCFI 3526

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO. 566 OF 2020

_____________

BETWEEN    
Hossain Mohammed Belal Applicant
and
Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office Putative Respondent
and
Director of Immigration Putative Interested Party

_____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge (Non-Refoulement Claims) YW Hew in Court
Date of Form CALL-1: 13 August 2025
Date of Corrigendum: 27 August 2025

____________________

CORRIGENDUM

____________________

Please note the following correction(s) in the Form CALL-1 dated 13 August 2025:

1)  Page 1, “Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) YW Hew:

1. The Form 86 is amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the Putative Respondent;

2. Leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.”

should read

“Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) YW Hew:

1. The Form 86 is amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the Putative Respondent;

2.  Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.”

Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.”

2)  Page 7 “For completeness, I also dismiss the applications made in the Form 86 for an extension of time, continuation of anonymity or sealing orders which the Applicant claims were made at the commencement of these proceedings, and for costs.”

should read

“For completeness, I refuse to make the orders sought in the Form 86 for an extension of time, continuation of anonymity or sealing orders which the Applicant claims were made at the commencement of these proceedings, and for costs.”

  (Teresa Ng)
  Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge (Non-Refoulement Claims)
  YW Hew