Limbu Bishnu Maya v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Case No.HCAL 294/2017[2025] HKCFI 3795

Court

High Court CFI

Date28 Aug 2025

Judge—

Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCAL 294/2017

[2025] HKCFI 3795

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 294 of 2017

BETWEEN
	Limbu Bishnu Maya	Applicant
	and
	Torture Claims Appeal Board/	Putative
	Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office	Respondent
	and
	Director of Immigration	Putative
		Interested Party

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

consideration of documents only; or

consideration of documents and oral submissions by the Applicant in open court;

Order by Deputy High Court Judge To:

Leave to apply for Judicial Review be discontinued.

Observations for the Applicant:

Introduction

1.This is the Applicant’s application by Form 86 filed on 15 June 2017 for leave to apply for judicial review (the “leave application”) of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”) dismissing his appeal against the decision of the Director of Immigration refusing her application for non-refoulement protection.

Discussion and conclusion

2.On 20 July 2017, the Applicant filed a Notice of Discontinuance pursuant to Order 21, Rule 2 of the Rules of the High Court to wholly discontinue the leave application. In view of the procedure taken by the Applicant, the Court was satisfied that she has no intention to prosecute her leave application. Accordingly, the application is discontinued.

Dated the 28^th day of August 2025

( Seline Sze )
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence

Notes for the Applicant: If leave has been granted, the Applicant or the Applicant’s solicitors must:
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A); b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).		Sent to the Applicant on 28/08/2025 Limbu Bishnu Maya Applicant’s ref. no: Nil		Sent to the Putative Respondent / the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on 28/08/2025 Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office Putative Respondent’s ref. no.: Director of Immigration Putative Interested Party’s ref. no.: Department of Justice, Senior Assistant Law Officer (Civil Law) (Civil Litigation Unit 2)

Form CALL-1

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Limbu Bishnu Maya v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

High Court CFI02 Feb 2023