Md Billal Hossain v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Case No.HCAL 2745/2019[2025] HKCFI 4590
Court
High Court CFI
Date02 Oct 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCAL 2745/2019

[2025] HKCFI 4590

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 2745 of 2019

BETWEEN

  Md Billal Hossain Applicant
  and  
  Torture Claims Appeal Board/
Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative Respondent
  and  
  Director of Immigration Putative Interested Party

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

    consideration of documents only;       or
   consideration of documents and oral submissions by the Applicant in open court;

Order by Deputy High Court Judge To dated 25 September 2025:

1.  Application to withdraw the application for leave to apply for Judicial Review (“Form 86”) be granted; and

2.  Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review be withdrawn.

Observations for the Applicant:

Introduction

1.This is the Applicant’s application by Form 86 filed on 19 September 2019 for leave to apply for judicial review (the “leave application”) of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”) and the Director of Immigration (the “Director”) dismissing his appeal against the decision of the Director refusing his application for non-refoulement protection (the “Decision”).

2.An oral hearing on 25 September 2025 was scheduled for hearing his application. On 11 September 2025, the Applicant filed an affirmation seeking to withdraw his leave application asserting that he wants to return to his home country as soon as possible.

3.At the oral hearing, after the legal principles applicable to judicial review was explained to the Applicant, he confirmed he had no complaint about errors of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Decision. He said that he wished to withdraw his leave application because his problems in his home country were solved and it is now safe for him to return. He confirmed that he made the application to withdraw out of his own free will and understood that if his application to withdraw is allowed, the Decision of the Board remains in force. This Court is therefore satisfied that his decision to withdraw his leave application is an informed and conscious decision freely made. Accordingly, his withdrawal application is allowed and his application for leave to apply for judicial review is withdrawn.

Dated the 2nd day of October 2025

  ( Seline Sze )
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence




Notes for the Applicant:

If leave has been granted, the Applicant or the Applicant’s solicitors must:

       
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A);

b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and

c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).
  Sent to the Applicant
on 02/10/2025

Md Billal Hossain

Applicant’s ref. no:
Nil
  Sent to the Putative Respondent / the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on 02/10/2025

Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative Respondent’s ref. no.:
USM 14634/18/11/477/B1734

Director of Immigration
Putative Interested Party’s ref. no.:
QA T/C 4116/18 (Formerly RBCZ/2002436/14)


Department of Justice,
Senior Assistant Law Officer
(Civil Law)
(Civil Litigation Unit 2)



Form CALL-1