Md Billal Hossain v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
|
HCAL 2745/2019 [2025] HKCFI 4590 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 2745 of 2019
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Following;
Order by Deputy High Court Judge To dated 25 September 2025:
Observations for the Applicant: Introduction 1.This is the Applicant’s application by Form 86 filed on 19 September 2019 for leave to apply for judicial review (the “leave application”) of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”) and the Director of Immigration (the “Director”) dismissing his appeal against the decision of the Director refusing his application for non-refoulement protection (the “Decision”). 2.An oral hearing on 25 September 2025 was scheduled for hearing his application. On 11 September 2025, the Applicant filed an affirmation seeking to withdraw his leave application asserting that he wants to return to his home country as soon as possible. 3.At the oral hearing, after the legal principles applicable to judicial review was explained to the Applicant, he confirmed he had no complaint about errors of law, procedural unfairness or irrationality in the Decision. He said that he wished to withdraw his leave application because his problems in his home country were solved and it is now safe for him to return. He confirmed that he made the application to withdraw out of his own free will and understood that if his application to withdraw is allowed, the Decision of the Board remains in force. This Court is therefore satisfied that his decision to withdraw his leave application is an informed and conscious decision freely made. Accordingly, his withdrawal application is allowed and his application for leave to apply for judicial review is withdrawn. Dated the 2nd day of October 2025
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Form CALL-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||