HKSAR v. So Tsun Fung (蘇浚鋒)

Read the full judgment text of FAMC 14/2025 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment.

1. We are satisfied that leave to appeal should be granted in respect of the following Questions, namely:

Cited by 1 case

Case No.FAMC 14/2025[2025] HKCFA 18
Court
FAMC
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FAMC No. 14 of 2025

[2025] HKCFA 18

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 14 OF 2025 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA NO. 457 OF 2023)

___________________________

BETWEEN    
HKSAR Respondent
and
SO TSUN FUNG (蘇浚鋒) Applicant

___________________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Lam PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 17 October 2025

______________________

DETERMINATION

______________________

The Appeal Committee:

1.We are satisfied that leave to appeal should be granted in respect of the following Questions, namely:

Question 1

Whether the offence created under section 27A of the Elections (Corrupt and Illegal Conduct) Ordinance, Cap 554 (“ECICO”) has unconstitutionally infringed the right to the freedom of expression under Articles 27 and 39 of the Basic Law and Article 16(2) of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights (“BOR”);

Question 2

Whether the offence created under section 27A of the ECICO has unconstitutionally infringed the right to equality before the law under Article 25 of the Basic Law and Articles 1(1) and 22 of the BOR. 

2.The appeal will be listed for hearing on 20 May 2026.

 (R A V Ribeiro) (Joseph Fok) (M H Lam)
Permanent Judge Permanent Judge Permanent Judge

Mr Carter Chim, Ms Yvonne Leung and Mr Jason Szeto, instructed by Ho Kan Lawyers, for the Applicant

Mr Ned Lai DDPP and Mr Timothy Chen SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case