Mboweto Ibrahim Mohamed v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 2902/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 11 November 2025.

1. The applicant is an illegal immigrant by staying in Hong Kong without permission and he lodged a non-refoulement claim with the Director of Immigration (“the Director”). The Director rejected his application. He did not appeal to the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“the Board”), but he file Form 86 for judicial review of a Board’s Decision, which the court was unable to locate on the court’s file.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.HCAL 2902/2019[2025] HKCFI 4911
Court
High Court CFI
Date11 Nov 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 2902/2019

[2025] HKCFI 4911

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO. 2902 OF 2019

_____________

Mboweto Ibrahim Mohamed Applicant
And
Torture Claims Appeal Board/
Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative Respondent
And
Director of Immigration Putative Interested Party

_____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge K W Lung in Court
Date of Hearing: 6 October 2025
Date of Decision: 11 November 2025

_____________

D E C I S I O N

_____________

The application

1.The applicant is an illegal immigrant by staying in Hong Kong without permission and he lodged a non-refoulement claim with the Director of Immigration (“the Director”). The Director rejected his application. He did not appeal to the Torture Claims Appeal Board (“the Board”), but he file Form 86 for judicial review of a Board’s Decision, which the court was unable to locate on the court’s file.

2.The Court had made enquiry with the Board, which confirmed that the applicant had never filed an appeal with the Board.

3.The Court summoned the applicant to appear before it in order to hear his explanation. He was absent. By its Form CALL-1 dated 13 July 2025, this Court dismissed the applicant’s judicial review application.

4.The applicant applied for extension of time to appeal against the court’s decision. The Court summoned him to appear before it.

5.On 6 October 2025, the applicant appeared before this Court and agreed to the facts above.

6.In the circumstances, I refuse to extend time for his appeal. Accordingly, I dismiss his application.

  (K.W. Lung)
  Deputy High Court Judge

The applicant appeared in person.