Read the full judgment text of HCMP 000389/1994 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 3 May 1994.
2. The Licensing Court, which was presided over by a magistrate and two lay assessors, gave detailed reasons for their refusal. At the hearing before them, neither the second nor the third respondents had made any objection to the renewal of the appellant's licence. The opposition had come from the first respondent, whose company had borrowed moneys from the appellant by discounting a cheque drawn by a Jin Tai Ltd.