Hansom Finance Ltd (in Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) v. Yang Haoying
Read the full judgment text of HCA 784/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 November 2025.
1. Page 5, paragraph 13 (1), lines T to U: “no substantial borrowers’ or assists in Hong Kong” should read “no substantial assets in Hong Kong”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
HCA 784/2022 [2025] HKCFI 5278 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 784 OF 2022 ________________________
________________________
________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 7 November 2025:- 1.Page 5, paragraph 13 (1), lines T to U: “no substantial borrowers’ or assists in Hong Kong” should read “no substantial assets in Hong Kong”. 2.Page 6, paragraph 15, line N to O: “The enclosed,” should read “They enclosed”. 3.Page 10, paragraph 20, Line C: “a loan an unsecured of” should read “an unsecured loan of”. 4.Page 10, paragraph 22, Line L: “interest rates” should read “interest rate”. 5.Page 14, paragraph 31, Line I: “(§§1 and 2)” should read “(§§1 and 2 of Yang-WS)” 6.Page 14, Line P: a sub-heading read as “E1. Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence” should be added above paragraph 33. 7.Page 18, paragraph 39, Line M: “the both cases” should read “that both cases”. 8.Page 20, Line O: “E1. Duty to exercise independent judgment” should read “E2. Duty to exercise independent judgment”. 9.Page 22, Line B: “E2. Duty to act bona fide in the best interests of the Company” should read “E3. Duty to act bona fide in the best interests of the Company”. Dated the 1st day of December 2025
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 784/2022