Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 23 January 1995.
1. Mr. Jackson's affidavit which was filed on 20th January explains that decision to me. I now understand what it means. It refers, as Mr. Dykes suspected, to those officers whose agreements had expired without being renewed, but who had accumulated leave which they had not taken, and who therefore continued to receive leave payments. The only basis on which it is said that leave to challenge this decision should not be given is on the footing of insufficient standing on the part of the Applican