Kasrif Miyati Bt Waska v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1125/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 12 March 2026.

1. This is the Applicant’s application by Form 86 filed on 7 July 2023 for leave to apply for judicial review (the “leave application”) of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”) dismissing her appeal against the decision of the Director of Immigration  refusing her application for non-refoulement protection (the “Decision”).

Case No.HCAL 1125/2023[2026] HKCFI 1464
Court
High Court CFI
Date12 Mar 2026
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 1125/2023

[2026] HKCFI 1464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 1125 of 2023

BETWEEN

  Kasrif Miyati Bt Waska Applicant
  and  
  Torture Claims Appeal Board/ Putative
  Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office Respondent
  and  
  Director of Immigration Putative
    Interested Party

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

    consideration of documents only;          or
   consideration of documents and oral submissions by the Applicant in open court;

Order by Deputy High Court Judge To:

1.  Application to withdraw the application for leave to apply for Judicial Review (“Form 86”) be granted; and

2.  Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review be withdrawn.

Observations for the Applicant:

Introduction

1.This is the Applicant’s application by Form 86 filed on 7 July 2023 for leave to apply for judicial review (the “leave application”) of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”) dismissing her appeal against the decision of the Director of Immigration  refusing her application for non-refoulement protection (the “Decision”).

Discussion and conclusion

2.To ensure that the withdrawal is valid and properly made, the Applicant was given directions by letter to file an affirmation or a statement confirming:

(a)  that her application to withdraw the application for leave to apply for judicial review is made out of her own free will;

(b)  that it is now safe for her to return to her home country; and

(c)  that she understands that if her application to withdraw is approved, the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office dismissing her appeal against the decision of the Director of Immigration in the Notice of Decision shall be final and shall remain in force.

3.In compliance with the directions, the Applicant filed an affirmation dated 3 March 2026 confirming the above. In view of the assertions in her affirmation, the Court is satisfied that the Applicant made the withdrawal application out of her own free will; that she understands if her withdrawal application is allowed, her leave application may be withdrawn; that the Decision of the Board will be final and binding on her; and that she may be refouled to her home country. Accordingly, the Court granted her leave to withdraw her leave application.

Dated the 12th day of March 2026

  ( Seline Sze )
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence




Notes for the Applicant:

If leave has been granted, the Applicant or the Applicant’s solicitors must:

       
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A);

b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and

c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).
  Sent to the Applicant
on 12/03/2026

Kasrif Miyati Bt Waska

Applicant’s ref. no:
Nil
  Sent to the Putative Respondent / the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on 12/03/2026

Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative Respondent’s ref. no.:
USM 21132

Director of Immigration
Putative Interested Party’s ref. no.:


Department of Justice,
Senior Assistant Law Officer
(Civil Law)
(Civil Litigation Unit 2)



Form CALL-1