Shrestha Bishwo and Another v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
|
HCAL 2897/2025 [2026] HKCFI 3292 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 2897 of 2025
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3) Following;
Order by Deputy High Court Judge To:
Observations for the Applicants: Introduction 1.This is the Applicants’ application by Form 86 filed on 30 December 2025 for leave to apply for judicial review (the “leave application”) of the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office (the “Board”) dated 20 August 2025 (the “Decision”) dismissing their appeal against the decision of the Director of Immigration refusing their application for non-refoulement protection. 2.On 30 April 2026, the Court received a letter from the 1st Applicant through the Immigration Department applying to withdraw his leave application (the “withdrawal application”) asserting (i) that he wants to withdraw his leave application; (ii) that he wants to return to his home country; and (iii) that the issues in his home country have been resolved. On 8 May 2026, the Court also received a similar letter from the 2nd Applicant applying to withdraw her leave application (the “withdrawal application”) and making the same assertions. 3.Reading the decision of the Board and all the papers, there is nothing to suggest that their decision to withdraw their leave applications were made otherwise than out of their own free will with full understanding of the consequences of the withdrawal and that it is safe for them to return to their respective home country. This Court is therefore satisfied that their decisions to withdraw are informed and conscious decisions freely made. Accordingly, their withdrawal applications are allowed and their application for leave to apply for judicial review is withdrawn. Dated the 9th day of June 2026
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Form CALL-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||