HKSAR v. Ngo Wai

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 142/2002 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 March 2002.

1. On 21 January of this year the appellant was convicted after trial of an offence of wounding contrary to Section 19 of the Offences Against the Person Ordinance Cap 212. He was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment. He appeals against both his conviction and his sentence.

Case No.HCMA 142/2002
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Mar 2002
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000142/2002

HCMA 142/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 142 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM TMCC NO. 2762 of 2001)

____________

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
NGO Wai Appellant

____________

Coram: Hon Jackson J in Court

Date of Hearing: 27 March 2002

Date of Judgment: 27 March 2002

Date of Reasons for Judgment: 9 April 2002

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1.On 21 January of this year the appellant was convicted after trial of an offence of wounding contrary to Section 19 of the Offences Against the Person Ordinance Cap 212. He was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment. He appeals against both his conviction and his sentence.

2.What the appellant said to me during the course of hearing this appeal was simply that he did not commit the offence; that the Magistrate was wrong to convict him of it, and that those witnesses (including the 'victim') who gave evidence against him had told lies.

3.In his careful 'statement of findings' and 'reasons for sentence' the Magistrate said that he believed the prosecution witnesses and that he did not believe the appellant's account of matters. He went to some lengths to explain why.

4.The Magistrate saw and heard the witnesses and formed a view which he, as the finder of facts, was perfectly entitled to form. His sentence, again which he explains in some detail, cannot be faulted. That sentence was neither excessive (given the nature of the wounds inflicted upon the 'victim' by the appellant with a chopper) nor wrong in principle.

5.For these reasons this appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.

(C G Jackson)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Representation:

Mr W S Cheung, SADPP of Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Mr Ngo Wai, Appellant in person