HKSAR v. Tsang Sau Ying

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1104/1998 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 January 1999.

1. This is an appeal against the conviction after trial of the appellant on two charges of blackmail and theft. The appellant appears before me in person; she was legally represented during her trial in the Kwun Tong Magistracy.

Case No.HCMA 1104/1998
Court
High Court CFI
Date14 Jan 1999
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA001104/1998

HCMA 1104 of 1998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. HCMA1104 OF 1998

____________________

BETWEEN:
HKSAR Respondent
AND
TSANG SAU YING Defendant

____________________

Coram: Deputy Judge Jackson in Court

Date of Hearing: 14 January 1999

Date of Judgment: 14 January 1999

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. This is an appeal against the conviction after trial of the appellant on two charges of blackmail and theft. The appellant appears before me in person; she was legally represented during her trial in the Kwun Tong Magistracy.

2. The appellant's grounds of appeal appear to be twofold: firstly that the Learned Magistrate failed to take into account all of the surrounding circumstances, which led up to the alleged offences and, secondly, that the Learned Magistrate did not accept her evidence because she was a nightclub hostess.

3. As to the first matter, and after careful enquiry of the appellant, I am entirely satisfied that all relevant matters were fully before the Magistrate and were given full consideration. The appellant herself gave evidence during her trial.

4. As to the second matter, the Learned Magistrate, in her careful statement of findings, said this - and I quote

"I again also bore in mind the appellant's previous clear record. Her occupation was relevant only as to [a fact in issue]" (the words in square brackets are mine).

5. Having considered carefully the transcript before me, I am unable to find any matter in respect of which the Learned Magistrate might have fallen into error, and thus I cannot say that the conviction of the appellant was in any way unsafe or unsatisfactory.

For these reasons the appeal must be dismissed.

(C. G. Jackson)
Deputy Judge of the Court of First Instance

Representation:

Mr. Robert Lee, SGC for HKSAR/DPP

Ms. TSANG Sau-ying, Appellant in Person