HKSAR v. Tsang Sau Ying
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1104/1998 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 January 1999.
1. This is an appeal against the conviction after trial of the appellant on two charges of blackmail and theft. The appellant appears before me in person; she was legally represented during her trial in the Kwun Tong Magistracy.
|
HCMA001104/1998 HCMA 1104 of 1998 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. HCMA1104 OF 1998 ____________________
____________________ Coram: Deputy Judge Jackson in Court Date of Hearing: 14 January 1999 Date of Judgment: 14 January 1999 _______________ J U D G M E N T _______________ 1. This is an appeal against the conviction after trial of the appellant on two charges of blackmail and theft. The appellant appears before me in person; she was legally represented during her trial in the Kwun Tong Magistracy. 2. The appellant's grounds of appeal appear to be twofold: firstly that the Learned Magistrate failed to take into account all of the surrounding circumstances, which led up to the alleged offences and, secondly, that the Learned Magistrate did not accept her evidence because she was a nightclub hostess. 3. As to the first matter, and after careful enquiry of the appellant, I am entirely satisfied that all relevant matters were fully before the Magistrate and were given full consideration. The appellant herself gave evidence during her trial. 4. As to the second matter, the Learned Magistrate, in her careful statement of findings, said this - and I quote "I again also bore in mind the appellant's previous clear record. Her occupation was relevant only as to [a fact in issue]" (the words in square brackets are mine). 5. Having considered carefully the transcript before me, I am unable to find any matter in respect of which the Learned Magistrate might have fallen into error, and thus I cannot say that the conviction of the appellant was in any way unsafe or unsatisfactory. For these reasons the appeal must be dismissed.
Representation: Mr. Robert Lee, SGC for HKSAR/DPP Ms. TSANG Sau-ying, Appellant in Person |