HKSAR v. Ho Kun Wing
Read the full judgment text of CACC 22/2000 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 30 June 2000.
1. It is not necessary to rehearse all the facts as the situation has been set out in our judgment relating to the application for leave to appeal against his conviction.
Cited by 1 case
|
CACC000022A/2000 CACC 22/2000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2000 (ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 770/1999) __________________
______________ Coram: Hon Mayo VP, Wong JA and Keith JA in Court Date of Hearing: 30 June 2000 Date of Judgment: 30 June 2000 ______________ J U D G M E N T ______________ Hon Mayo VP (giving the judgment of the Court): 1. It is not necessary to rehearse all the facts as the situation has been set out in our judgment relating to the application for leave to appeal against his conviction. 2. Notwithstanding a most eloquent submission from Mr Macrae SC we do not consider that it would be right for us to interfere with the sentence of 9 months imprisonment which was imposed. 3. We accept that the applicant is a man of hitherto excellent character and that this fall from grace will be felt most keenly by him and his family. However it was quite a serious conspiracy which was practised over a protracted period. The Judge gave careful consideration to all the mitigating factors. We do not consider that the sentence was either wrong in principle or manifestly excessive. Accordingly the application is dismissed.
Representation: Mr K P Zervos, SADPP of the Department of Justice, for the respondent Mr A Macrae, SC, instructed by Messrs Knight and Ho, for the applicant |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 22/2000