Shing Wei Enterprises Co. Ltd. v. Wu Hsiu Miam
Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 3033/2001 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 19 July 2001.
1. This is an appeal from the decision of Madam Registrar Au-Yeung made on 20 June 2001 refusing an application by the defendant to file a further affirmation in opposition to an Order 14 application made against him in these proceedings.
|
DCCJ003033/2001 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3033 OF 2001
Coram: H H Judge Cheung in Chambers Date of Judgment: 19 July 2001 _____________________ J U D G M E N T _____________________ 1.This is an appeal from the decision of Madam Registrar Au-Yeung made on 20 June 2001 refusing an application by the defendant to file a further affirmation in opposition to an Order 14 application made against him in these proceedings. 2.This morning the parties reached a complete agreement as to what order they would like to obtain from the court. Amongst other things, they wanted me to allow the appeal and give leave to the defendant to file his further evidence. Of course, a court sitting in its appellate jurisdiction does not, in my view, sit there simply to rubber stamp the parties' agreement, particularly when it involves allowing an appeal and reversing a decision made by a judicial officer in a court below. This is to some extent reflected in the practice of the Court of Appeal as pointed out to me by counsel and as set out in the White Book (para. 59/1/20). 3.Today the matter is slightly different. Firstly, although this is an appeal in name, in substance this is a de novo hearing it being an appeal from the learned registrar to a judge. Secondly, the substance of the appeal involves a procedural matter, i.e. the filing of further evidence in an Order 14 application. It involves case management and procedure. 4.So in those circumstances I think the parties' agreement does carry a lot of weight and I am satisfied that I should accede to the parties' request. So I am making the following orders by consent:
Representation: Present: Mr Patrick Chong, instructed by So & Co., for the Plaintiff Mrs Dora Chan, instructed by C K Mok & Co., for the Defendant |
Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 3033/2001