Roadrunner Apparel Incorporation v. Majone Garment Factory Ltd.
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 5094/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 14 December 1999.
1. This is an ex parte urgent application for a mareva injunction against the Defendant. I have looked at the papers which have been put before me. I do not see any or any sufficient evidence that the Defendant intends to dissipate its assets whether in the form of quotas or proceeds of sale from those quotas. Mr Bok has frankly admitted that there is no or no clear evidence of such an intention though he says it would be difficult to find such evidence. But if that is the case, the Plaintiff sh
|
HCMP005094/1999 HCMP 5094/1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS ACTION NO. MP 5094 OF 1999 ____________________
____________________ Coram: Hon Yuen J in Chambers Date of hearing: 14 December 1999 Date of Decision: 14 December 1999 _____________ D E C I S I O N _____________ 1. This is an ex parte urgent application for a mareva injunction against the Defendant. I have looked at the papers which have been put before me. I do not see any or any sufficient evidence that the Defendant intends to dissipate its assets whether in the form of quotas or proceeds of sale from those quotas. Mr Bok has frankly admitted that there is no or no clear evidence of such an intention though he says it would be difficult to find such evidence. But if that is the case, the Plaintiff should not come running to court for such a draconian remedy against a party. 2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
Representation: Mr Bok Tin Yuen, instructed by Messrs Anthony Au & Co., for Plaintiff |