Read the full judgment text of FAMV 000027/2000 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 20 October 2000 before Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Chan PJ, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ.
Matrimonial proceedings – ancillary relief – application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal – s.22(1)(a) of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance – whether the Court of Appeal's order refusing leave to appeal was final or interlocutory – held interlocutory, no right of appeal – s.22(1)(b) – whether proposed questions raise question of law of great general or public importance – complaints of trial judge's conduct including alleged pre-determination and reversal of procedure – held no such question and no exceptional circumstances – application refused with costs
Legal issues: Right of appeal under s.22(1)(a) CFA Ordinance · Leave to appeal under s.22(1)(b) CFA Ordinance
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal refused.