HKSAR v. Yip Kwan Hung

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 131/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 2 March 1999.

1. The Appellant appeared before the Magistrate on 24 November 1998 when he pleaded not guilty to a charge of injection of a dangerous drug, namely, heroin hydrochloride. It was only on 4 January 1999 when the matter came up for trial that he admitted the offence and pleaded guilty.

Case No.HCMA 131/1999
Court
High Court CFI
Date02 Mar 1999
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000131/1999

HCMA131/99

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 131 OF 1999

----------------------

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
YIP KWAN HUNG Appellant

-----------------------

Coram : Hon Woo J. in Court

Date of hearing : 2 March 1999

Date of judgment : 2 March 1999

-------------------------

J U D G M E N T

-------------------------

1. The Appellant appeared before the Magistrate on 24 November 1998 when he pleaded not guilty to a charge of injection of a dangerous drug, namely, heroin hydrochloride. It was only on 4 January 1999 when the matter came up for trial that he admitted the offence and pleaded guilty.

2. According to the case ofR v Lam Wai Ping, M.A. Nos.239 and 240 of 1997 (17 June 1997, unreported), my learned brother Patrick Chan J (as he then was) held that a reduction of the sentence by a later plea by one-quarter could not be faulted. The Magistrate obviously took into account that authority. He adopted a starting point of 12 months and because of the plea, but not at the first opportunity, he reduced it by one-quarter to nine months' imprisonment.

3. I do not see the sentence being wrong in principle in any way or excessive. I therefore dismiss the appeal.

(K.H. Woo)
Judge of the Court of First Instance, High Court

Representation:

Mr William Lam, S.G.C. of DPP, for HKSAR

Appellant in person, present