Wai Yin Wa v. Laminate Enterprises Ltd.
|
HCPI000514B/1997 H.C.P.I. No.514 /1997 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE PERSONAL INJURIES LIST NO. 514 OF 1997 ____________________
______________________________ Coram: Master Barnes in Chambers Dates of hearing and decision: 23rd December 1999 _____________________________ REVIEW OF NISI COSTS ORDER _____________________________ Application On 8th November 1999, I made a nisi costs order in the following terms:
The Plaintiff applied to review the said nisi order. Variation made 1. After hearing submissions from Mr. Budge for the Plaintiff and Mr. Kwok for the defendant, I decided to vary the said costs order to the extent that the Defendant do pay the costs of the assessment to the Plaintiff on a Common Fund basis, to be taxed if not agreed. Reasons for the variation 2. As for the variation from 80% to total costs of the assessment, I accepted Mr. Budge's submission that the Plaintiff did have the support of an imminent medical expert who had assessed her case to be that of MDD. The fact that the court eventually found in favour of the Defendant on this issue is not a ground to deprive her of the costs in putting this argument forward. 3. As to the variation from "Party to Party" basis to that of "Common Fund" basis, I also agreed with Mr. Budge's submission. The Plaintiff, who is undoubtedly suffering from mental illness, is suing through a next friend. She is legally aided. After considering the authority of Tai Chau Yung and Chu Yau v Ng Jim et al (HCPI No. 753 of 1997), I am of the view that a court in exercising its discretion should award costs on a Common Fund basis to safeguard the interest of an aided Plaintiff who is under a disability. I am also of the view that the same approach should be adopted whether the case was compromised by settlement or concluded after a full assessment. Costs of the application 4. The Plaintiff will also have the costs of this application on a Common Fund basis, to be taxed if not agreed.
Representation: Mr. Budge of Wilkinson & Grist for the Plaintiff Mr. T. Kwok, instructed by Vivien Chan & Co. for the Defendant. |