Read the full judgment text of FAMC 000023/2001 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 28 September 2001.
1. In January this applicant sought leave to appeal under the "substantial and grave injustice" limb. His application was dismissed. He now applies again: under that limb and also under the "point of law of great and general importance" limb. A second application after dismissal of the first is misconceived. In passing, we would mention that the point which we are now asked to certify involves dressing up an issue of fact as a point of law. There is nothing in this application, and it is dismiss