Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 26 March 1999.
1. The premises to which this action relates were let by the Defendant to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff claims that, before the tenancy agreement was concluded, the Defendant said that (a) the premises were suitable for a light refreshment restaurant licence to be obtained for a restaurant on the premises, and (b) there were no illegal structures on the premises. The Plaintiff's case is that in fact there were illegal structures on the premises, and that their presence on the premises prevented t