Chan Chi Ming and Another v. Man Tsong Shau
Read the full judgment text of HCMP 6958/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 November 2000.
1. This is an application for declarations by originating summons. The defendant was absent at the hearing and in fact, had never made any appearance. The land lots in question were Nos.69, 200, 519, 573, 729, 731, 865, 919, 1028, 1061, 1138, 1481, 1615 and 1124 in Lantau Island D.D.305. The plaintiff obtained the lots by virtue of section 17 of the New Territories Ordinance, Cap.97 and became the registered owner.
Cites 1 case
|
HCMP006958/1999 HCMP6958/1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO.6958 OF 1999 ---------------------------
---------------------------- Coram: Hon Tong J in Court Date of Hearing: 17 November 2000 Date of Judgment: 17 November 2000 ------------------------- J U D G M E N T ------------------------- 1. This is an application for declarations by originating summons. The defendant was absent at the hearing and in fact, had never made any appearance. The land lots in question were Nos.69, 200, 519, 573, 729, 731, 865, 919, 1028, 1061, 1138, 1481, 1615 and 1124 in Lantau Island D.D.305. The plaintiff obtained the lots by virtue of section 17 of the New Territories Ordinance, Cap.97 and became the registered owner. 2. However, the lots were found to be encumbered by a mortgage registered in favour of one Man Tsong Shau, who was the named defendant in the present proceedings. The mortgage seemed to have been created in 1905. However, apart from the fact that the Land Registry had a record that "As stated in Block Government Lease, the lot is subject to mortgage in favour of Man Tsong Shau", there was no further particulars about this mortgage. Upon enquiry by the plaintiffs' solicitors, the Land Registry, by a letter dated 17 February 2000, replied that :
3. The plaintiffs' solicitors had also written to the Immigration Department in an attempt to trace the said defendant. The Immigration Department wrote back to the solicitors on 14 January 2000, stating that :
4. Pursuant to Master Ho's order dated 14 April 2000, substituted service of the summons on the defendant was effected by way of newspaper advertisement. At one stage, the summons was re-amended by which two paragraphs were added in compliance with the judgment of Godfrey J (as he then was) in Fung Kam Cheung & Ors v. Kwok Yiu Wing & Ors [1991] 1 HKC 321. 5. In the re-amended originating summons, the plaintiff asked for the following orders :
6. Having heard counsel for the plaintiff and having considered the authorities1, I found that the declarations sought ought to be granted. However, I could not say, based on the material before this court, that the said mortgage should be declared null and void. There was no basis to say that it was null and void ab initio. 7. Hence, I shall grant the orders in terms of the re-amended summons, except the reference to the mortgage being null and void. Further, having heard counsel, it is ordered that there be no order as to costs for the whole proceedings.
Representation: Mr William M.F. Wong, instructed by Messrs Kenneth C.C. Man & Co., for the Plaintiffs Defendant, Man Tsong-shau (Absent) 1 Fung Kam Cheung & Ors v. Kwok Yiu Wing & Ors [1991] 1 HKC 321; and Cheng Tin Loi & Li Yung Hing & Anor [1999] 3 HKC 699 |
Cases cited in this judgment