Read the full judgment text of DCEC 000713/1996 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 28 October 1997.
2. The Applicant claimed that he was a permanent worker earning $7,200 per month plus $300 travelling allowance. In addition, he was paid a thirteenth month pay including the travelling allowance at the year end. However, according to Mr. Chung who was in charge of administration in the Respondent's business, the Applicant was a casual worker and was paid only $7,200 a month without the extra thirteenth month pay at the end of the year. Neither party can produce any documentary proof in support