Au Hon Man v. Kingston Finance Ltd.

Read the full judgment text of HCA 17120/1998 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 27 August 1999.

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the order of the master giving unconditional leave to defend will be allowed, and I propose to give judgment for the plaintiff, although it is arguable that Kingston Finance Limited ("KFL") is entitled to set-off against the plaintiff's claim the losses KFL claims to have suffered in so far as it cannot recover moneys due to it from clients introduced to KSL by the plaintiff. (It seems to me that this result can be said to have been contemplated by the agreement

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCA 17120/1998
Court
High Court CFI
Date27 Aug 1999
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA017120/1998

HCA 10407/1998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

BETWEEN
KINGSTON SECURITIES LIMITED 1st Plaintiff
KINGSTON FINANCE LIMITED 2nd Plaintiff
AND
DAVID AU HON MAN Defendant

---------------

HCA 17120/1998

AND BETWEEN
AU HON MAN Plaintiff
AND
KINGSTON FINANCE LIMITED Defendant

----------------------

Coram : Godfrey, J.A. in Chambers (sitting as an additional Judge of the Court of First Instance)

Date of Hearing : 27 August 1999

Date of Judgment : 27 August 1999

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the order of the master giving unconditional leave to defend will be allowed, and I propose to give judgment for the plaintiff, although it is arguable that Kingston Finance Limited ("KFL") is entitled to set-off against the plaintiff's claim the losses KFL claims to have suffered in so far as it cannot recover moneys due to it from clients introduced to KSL by the plaintiff. (It seems to me that this result can be said to have been contemplated by the agreement which the plaintiff made with KSL on or about 29 March 1996, although KFL is not a party subscribing to the agreement of that date. The expression "the Firm" as used in that agreement seems to support this. The underlying contract on which all parties rely may arguably be said to have been a contract made between the plaintiff, on the one hand, and both KFL and Kingston Securities Limited ("KSL"), on the other hand.) However, there is no defence to the plaintiff's claim as to the moneys standing to his credit in his account with KFL, and (as I have said) I will give judgment in the plaintiff's favour against KFL accordingly. I will stay execution of the judgment, pending the trial of any counterclaim KSL or KFL may have against the plaintiff, and I propose to order that the costs of the plaintiff's application for summary judgment be costs in the cause, so that the costs will follow the event, i.e. whether the plaintiff succeeds or fails on the KFL/KSL counterclaim.

2. I will give leave to the plaintiff to serve his notice of appeal out of time.

3. I will dismiss the plaintiff's summons to strike out the KFL/KSL action. I will not disturb the master's order for consolidation of the two actions.

4. I will make no further order as to costs.

(Gerald Godfrey)
Justice of Appeal

Representation:

Mr. Mr. Kenneth C.K. Chow instructed by M/s. Richards Butler for Plaintiffs in HCA 10407/98 and Defendant in HCA 17120/98

Mr. Lawrence Ng instructed by M/s. W.M. Lo & Co. for Defendant in HCA 10407/98 and Plaintiff in HCA 17120/98