Read the full judgment text of FACV 000025/1998 on BabelCite. This FACV judgment was delivered on 16 September 1999.
1. I am asked to make two directions. In the fraudulent trading appeal, the respondents will say that concurrent findings of fact stand in the appellant's way, and that the Court ought not to disturb those findings. Indeed, the respondents have raised what they call an "objection" to the Court reviewing those findings; and they ask me, sitting as a single permanent judge, to direct that their objection be determined by the Court in a preliminary hearing to be held at the outset of the hearing of