Chan Kwai Kwun v. Man Chung Lap
Read the full judgment text of HCA 8862/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 15 May 2001.
1. This is the Plaintiff's application for time extension to make the payment into court ordered on 19 December 2000 (as varied by the order of 27 April 2001). I understand from Plaintiff's counsel that this in effect is an application for an interim stay of execution of the said orders pending the Plaintiff's intended appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Cited by 1 case
|
HCA008862A/1999 HCA 8862/1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 8862 OF 1999 ____________
____________ Coram: Hon Chung J in Chambers Date of Hearing: 15 May 2001 Date of Decision: 15 May 2001 _________ DECISION _________ 1. This is the Plaintiff's application for time extension to make the payment into court ordered on 19 December 2000 (as varied by the order of 27 April 2001). I understand from Plaintiff's counsel that this in effect is an application for an interim stay of execution of the said orders pending the Plaintiff's intended appeal to the Court of Appeal. 2. Although no Notice of Appeal has been lodged or served yet, Mr Chan, counsel for the Plaintiff, has kindly provided me with a copy of the revised draft Notice of Appeal. 3. In relation to the Plaintiff's contention made in this application that my decision on 27 April 2001 is wrong, without disrespect to Plaintiff's counsel, I will simply repeat what I have already stated in my "Reasons for Decision" dated 11 May 2001. 4. In relation to the Plaintiff's contention that he is financially unable to comply with the condition imposed in the said orders, I agree with the skeleton argument of defence counsel (especially page 4 thereof). 5. For the above reasons, this application is refused.
Representation: Mr Edward Chan, SC leading Mr Christopher Lam, instructed by Messrs Chan & Kong, for the Plaintiff Mr E C Mumford, SC, instructed by Messrs Chan & Tsu, for the Defendant |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 8862/1999