Read the full judgment text of HCMA 001013/2001 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 30 January 2002.
1. The 1st appellant was convicted after trial at San Po Kong Magistracy of three offences of theft of a chose in action contrary to section 9 of the Theft Ordinance Cap. 210 being the 1st to the 3rd charges, and his co-defendant wife, the 2nd appellant, was convicted of five separate offences of theft of a chose in action being the 4th to the 8th charges.