Ho Tam Kun v. HKSAR
Read the full judgment text of FAMC 26/1999 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 3 November 1999.
1. This is the determination of the Appeal Committee.
|
FAMC No. 26 of 1999 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 26 OF 1999 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM HCMA No. 276 OF 1999) _____________________
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Ching PJ and Mr Justice Nazareth NPJ Date of Hearing: 3 November 1999 Date of Determination: 3 November 1999 _____________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N _____________________________ Mr Justice Litton PJ: 1. This is the determination of the Appeal Committee. 2. The applicant was convicted after trial in a magistrate's court on one charge of common assault. The incident occurred at the Macau Ferry Terminal. There were three prosecution witnesses who testified to the events alleged by the prosecution. Their testimony was accepted by the magistrate. On 11 September 1999 the applicant's appeal to the High Court against his conviction was dismissed. He now seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. 3. There is no point of law of great and general importance involved in the decision. In these circumstances it is only in the most exceptional of circumstances that leave to appeal is given. No such circumstances have been shown in this case. 4. The application is dismissed.
Representation: Applicant, Ho Tam Kun in person Mr Cheung Wai Sun, DPGC of Department of Justice, for the Respondent |