Chow Kam Fai, David v. Rambas Marketing Co., Llc
Read the full judgment text of FAMV 8/2002 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 30 September 2002 before Bokhary PJ, Chan PJ, Ribeiro PJ.
1. Judgment has been obtained against the applicant, and no appeal has been brought against that judgment. In such circumstances, this application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal with a view to obtaining a stay of the proceedings on the ground of forum non-conveniens is not competent. It is dismissed.
Legal issues: Competence of application for leave to appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
|
FAMV000008/2002 FAMV No. 8 of 2002 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 8 OF 2002 (CIVIL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 1055 OF 2001) _____________________
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ Date of Hearing: 30 September 2002 Date of Determination: 30 September 2002 _____________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N _____________________________ Mr Justice Bokhary PJ: 1.Judgment has been obtained against the applicant, and no appeal has been brought against that judgment. In such circumstances, this application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal with a view to obtaining a stay of the proceedings on the ground of forum non-conveniens is not competent. It is dismissed. [Mr John Griffiths SC for the respondent asked for costs, and Mr Ronny Tong SC for the applicant indicated that he did not oppose costs.] Mr Justice Bokhary PJ: 2.With costs.
Representation: Mr Ronny K.W. Tong SC and Mr Russell Coleman (instructed by Messrs Wilkinson & Grist) for the applicant Mr John Griffiths SC and Mr Anthony Houghton (instructed by Messrs Deacons) for the respondent |