Luk Chi Keung and Another v. 法律援助署(九龍)

Read the full judgment text of HCMP 6507/2001 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 May 2002.

1. The plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that any point of law of great and general importance is involved in this case. The application is dismissed.

Cites 1 case

Case No.HCMP 6507/2001
Court
High Court CFI
Date29 May 2002
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMP006507/2001

HCMP 6507/2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 6507 OF 2001

(ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM HCA 551 of 2001)

______________

BETWEEN
LUK CHI KEUNG 1st Plaintiff
WAN CHUN YI 2nd Plaintiff
AND

法律援助署(九龍)

Defendant

______________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP and Hartmann J in Court

Date of Hearing: 29 May 2002

Date of Decision: 29 May 2002

_______________

D E C I S I O N

_______________

Hon Mayo VP (giving the decision of the Court):

1.The plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that any point of law of great and general importance is involved in this case. The application is dismissed.

2.They can take matter further with the Court of Final Appeal if they wish - not advising them to do so.

(Simon Mayo) (M.J. Hartmann)
Vice-President Judge of the Court of First Instance

Representation:

1st Plaintiff in person.

2nd Plaintiff in person.

Mr Chisum Ho, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Defendant.