Read the full judgment text of CACC 000236/1984 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.
1. On 14th November last year, the respondent was charged before a District Judge with 15 charges - 12 under the Theft Ordinance and 3 under the Crimes Ordinance. The trial proceeded on that basis until 29th November when the prosecution invited the trial judge to acquit the respondent of the 12th, 13th and 14th charges. At that stage, learned counsel for the respondent submitted to the trial judge that there was no case to answer in respect of all the remaining 12 charges. The judge ruled that