Read the full judgment text of HCA 000039/1998 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 February 2000.
2. There is no dispute that the Property had an illegal structure in the form of an unauthorized extension to the Flat Roof. Evidence from the Plaintiffs says that they did not know until the agreement had been signed that the extension was unauthorized. After discovery of the illegal nature of part of the Property, solicitors for the Plaintiff acting in the conveyance raised requisition in that regard. There is no evidence at all that the Defendant gave any answer to the requisition. In fact, t
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case