HKSAR v. Nguyen Van Nang

Read the full judgment text of HCMA 65/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 26 February 1999.

1. The Appellant appeals against conviction and sentence. However, nothing has been advanced by the Appellant in support of his appeal against conviction. I have checked the transcript very carefully and I do not see that there is anything that can give rise to any suspicion that the Magistrate was wrong to convict the Appellant. He accepted the prosecution's case and evidence, based on which he convicted the Appellant. I therefore dismiss the appeal against conviction.

Case No.HCMA 65/1999
Court
High Court CFI
Date26 Feb 1999
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCMA000065/1999

HCMA65/99

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 65 OF 1999

----------------------

BETWEEN
HKSAR Respondent
AND
NGUYEN VAN NANG Appellant

-----------------------

Coram : Hon Woo J in Court

Date of hearing : 26 February 1999

Date of judgment : 26 February 1999

-----------------------

J U D G M E N T

-----------------------

1. The Appellant appeals against conviction and sentence. However, nothing has been advanced by the Appellant in support of his appeal against conviction. I have checked the transcript very carefully and I do not see that there is anything that can give rise to any suspicion that the Magistrate was wrong to convict the Appellant. He accepted the prosecution's case and evidence, based on which he convicted the Appellant. I therefore dismiss the appeal against conviction.

2. In respect of sentence, the Magistrate passed a sentence of four months' imprisonment in respect of the charge against the Appellant for possession of dutiable goods. The dutiable goods involved were 22 cartons of cigarettes.

3. Looking at the record of previous convictions that the Appellant has, including no less than seven previous similar convictions that all took place in the year 1998, it appears to me that the sentence of four months' imprisonment was on the low side. But I do not think it proper for me to increase the sentence. The Magistrate was lenient to the Appellant. I dismiss the appeal against sentence.

(K.H. Woo)
Judge of the Court of First Instance, High Court

Representation:

Mr Robert K.Y. Lee, SGC of DPP, for HKSAR

Appellant in person, present