Kwok Ying Lung v. Ko Chi Hung and Another

Case No.HCMP 209/1999[2001] 3 HKC 480[2001] 3 HKC 380
Court
High Court CFI
Date16 May 2001
Judge
Case Document
100%

HCMP000209B/1999

HCMP209/1999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO.209 OF 1999

---------------

BETWEEN
KWOK YING LUNG Plaintiff
AND
KO CHI HUNG 1st Defendant
MAXWELL MABEL STRAUBE 2nd Defendant

---------------

Coram: Hon Cheung J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 16 May 2001

Date of Decision: 16 May 2001

-------------------------

D E C I S I O N

-------------------------

1. I have listened to the recording of the proceedings during the lunch time. It was not possible for me to ascertain from the recording that counsel had actually said the words "by consent" in relation to the direction on the hearing by the master because the recording was not complete. This is probably due to problem in the loading of the CD when the recording system was changed in the courts. I am, however, of the view that the direction was given by consent of the parties for these reasons. After the originating summons was issued, the parties first attended before Master Muttrie from whose order the appeal was made to me. The parties obviously wished the master to deal with the matter in the first place. When I gave the oral decision setting aside the Master's order, I had expressly stated that direction should be given and the matter should be adjourned for argument and that the deponents of the affidavits be tendered for cross-examination at the adjourned hearing. This reference to the adjournment must be a reference to the adjournment before the master. According to the endorsement made by my clerk of the hearing, counsel for the parties then dealt with the question of affidavits, date of hearing and cross-examination of the deponents. Then I gave the orders and directions. In my view, irrespective of whether counsel had said the words "by consent" or not, the order directing the hearing by master must have been made by the consent of the parties. Accordingly, I shall amend the order by inserting the word "by consent" to paragraph 2.

(P. Cheung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

Representation:

Mr Benjamin Chain, instructed by Messrs Cheng, Chan & Co., for the Plaintiff

Mr M.K. Liu, instructed by Messrs Quan & Co., for the Defendants

Related Cases
Ranked by citation overlap · cases that cite each other appear first

HKSAR v. Good Time Finance Ltd

HCMA 835/2009 · High Court CFI
15 May 2013
cites this

Sun Entertainment Culture Ltd v. Inversion Productions Ltd (Formerly Known As Tnc Productions Ltd)

CACV 335/2023 · Court of Appeal
27 Sep 2024
cites this
Full analysis

Lei Shing Hong Credit Ltd v. Lam Mei Yee and Another

HCMP 213/2023 · High Court CFI
20 Sep 2024
cites this

Chiu Yu Fong the Administratrix of the Estate of Wong Tse Keung Deceased v. Lau Kwong Wing

HCA 6099/1999 · High Court CFI
08 Sep 2010
cites this